Labor Market Continues to Struggle

Last Update: 06-Nov-09 15:50 ET

The employment report released on Nov. 6 continued to showcase a weakening in the labor situation, showing a 190,000 drop in payrolls and an increase to a 10.2% unemployment rate. However, the market shrugged off the news as stocks moved horizontally throughout the day.

A CNBC reporter made comments after the initial release that the market shouldn't care about the employment situation. Earnings reports from Q3 showed that firms were positioned so that they could make a decent profit regardless of a 9.6% unemployment rate. The CNBC report suggested that firms can continue to profit even though the unemployment rate has edged up beyond 10% to 10.2%.

The idea that firms can remain profitable is very strange to us. In order for firms to obtain revenues, they need people to buy from them. The increase in unemployment will continue to pull down wages and eventually cause a further drop in demand. There is no technical, statistical, or empirical evidence that suggests a drop in income will lead to higher consumption!

Given that income has to fall as unemployment rises, it is asinine to believe firms can continue to make a profit without further cost cuts. Of course further cost cutting involves laying off more workers, which increases the effects of the negative feedback loop the economy is currently in.

There are two main ways out of this vicious negative feedback cycle. One method would be if long term expected demand starts rising, which causes firms to ramp up production and, with it, increase wages. The second method would be for the government to provide a direct consumer stimulus which artificially inflates current demand. Firms would have to replace purchased goods by increasing production, which in turn, leads to higher income.

The government has already enacted multiple stimulus plans that have directly affected the consumer including income tax cuts, homebuyer tax credits, and an auto stimulus program. So far the stimulus has done wonders by pushing up consumer spending in Q3. However as these program fade, the pullback will be noticed with a sharp decline in spending in the following quarters.

Companies understand that the Q3 data is not due to a rise in consumer demand but from government spending. Firms have not changed their forecasts for future consumption and production is likely to stall in many sectors. This has led to higher unemployment forecasts.

The picture of the labor situation is even worse when the details of the report are examined.

Where Oh Where Is My Income Coming From? Oh Where Oh Where Can It Be?

The increase in the unemployment rate to 10.2% wasn't so shocking. Most economists have believed that unemployment won't top out until about 10.5%.

However, what made the jump so severe was that the increase in the unemployment rate was not due to workers reentering the job market but due to more people losing their jobs. The number of unemployed increased by 589,000 in October and at the same time the labor force contracted by 31,000. In fact, 259,000 workers left the labor force as they became so discouraged at finding a job.

The labor force participation rate has been steadily falling since the beginning of the recession and is now at 65.1%. This is the lowest level the rate has been since 1986!

The unemployment rate was expected to rise as more of the previous discouraged workers moved back into the labor market. This would push the rate up, but at the same time signal a strengthening in the labor sector as worker confidence in finding jobs also increased.

Our forecast of the labor market made at the beginning of the year, which we continue to stand by, shows unemployment peaking to almost 11% by the end of 2010 with mediocre economic growth through most of next year.

Our peak unemployment rate doesn't look too far off considering the unemployment rate including all discounted and marginally attached workers as part of the labor force has jumped 0.5 percentage points to 11.6%.

With an unemployment rate of 11.6%, how can the market truly believe firms can make a profit under these conditions?

The fact is, the increase in unemployment is going to continue draining worker savings and push down available income for spending.

Income is Not Coming From More Jobs

Many people discount the unemployment rate based on the survey method that is used to calculate it. The criticisms are fair. Instead, these people tend to use the payroll data to get a better understanding of the labor situation.

Here, the headline numbers look strong. Nonfarm payrolls declined 190,000 for the October and the payroll decline in both August and September were revised lower. It seems firms are steadying themselves at the current employment levels and do not need to institute more layoffs.

On the surface this is true. However underneath the headline number lies a very disturbing possible new trend.

Firms hired 34,000 temporary workers to fill positions that used to go to full-time workers.

The hiring shows up, not only as an increase in payrolls, but their wages are evaluated no differently than the other full-time employees.

There are two problems with this. First, the temporary workers may not last long if the economy doesn't right itself quick enough. Therefore, the increase of 34,000 workers could evaporate next month and pull down payrolls.

Second, temporary workers have a different marginal propensity to consume than full-time workers. This means that they tend to save at a higher rate. The income these workers receive is going to be used for consumption at a lower rate.

Both of these problems points to a drop in aggregate spending over the last month even though the payroll decline suggests an increase in consumer demand.

Where Does This Lead Us?

Unfortunately the conclusions about this month's payroll don't leave us with much to look forward to in terms of economic well-being.

Both the unemployment rate and payroll numbers are signifying lower aggregate spending.

While the market may believe this will have no effect on the profits of companies, there is no way revenues can be maintained given the continued severity of the job losses and, with it, income declines.

The U.S. seems to be stuck in a negative feedback loop where increased unemployment today begets more unemployment tomorrow.

Unfortunately, expected demand and government spending have thus far been unable to break the cycle.

--Jeffrey Rosen, Ph.D.

E-mail Alert To receive an E-mail Alert whenever this page is updated go to Edit My Profile.
Rate this Article
Click on the stars below to rate this article from 1 to 5
Low High

Article Popup